Polaris

A Roundup From The Space Capitol Forum

The crowd at Space Capitol Forum. Image: Alex Martin

The space community gathered at Payload’s first Space Capitol Forum on Tuesday to talk about ways for policy to adapt and better support the rapid advancements in space tech.

Setting the scene: The space industry is facing an important moment at the intersection of commercial space technology and policy as private companies take on missions ranging from astronaut launches to imaging Earth to attempting to harness space resources.

As these industries have developed, DC has often lagged behind. While the commercial tech is charging ahead, the regulatory and policy questions remain open, leaving companies in the lurch, sometimes showing regulators novel tech for the first time.

The forum delved into this intersection and attempted to bridge the gap between policy and industry in a few key areas: 

Orbital debris: Krystal Azelton, director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, didn’t mince words in urging the US to start acting with urgency when it comes to prioritizing space sustainability.

Janice Starzyk, the deputy director of the Office of Space Commerce, responded that the agency’s power is limited to the authorities Congress gives it. She also pointed to slow funding—for example, the office has taken flak for delays in its space traffic management system, which was ordered in 2018…but didn’t receive funding until 2023.

The one thing all panelists could agree on: it’s time for Congress to act on the matter, whether it’s the ORBITS Act or another piece of legislation. 

CLPS: Officials from Astrobotic and Firefly talked about how they’re pursuing a future lunar economy, even as legal and policy questions about ownership, infrastructure, and regulation on the Moon’s surface are still being debated domestically and internationally.

Long-term lunar missions will need power, life support, heat, and other infrastructure—a huge capital expenditure for the private market. Caryn Schenewerk, president of CS Consulting, said some in industry are discussing the idea of a lunar power purchasing agreement—essentially “if you build it, they will come.” 

The commitment, modeled after those on Earth, would allow the government to promise to buy a certain amount of capability from the private sector, allowing companies to fundraise and invest with a clearer demand signal from the market

Related Stories
Polaris

EO Providers Defend Their Spectrum Access

Commercial EO providers contribute to sectors ranging from agriculture to climate monitoring to defense—and now they’re banding together to make sure policymakers know the results of an administration-ordered study could put all of that in jeopardy.

Polaris

Space Foundation Looks to Boost DC Presence

“I don’t care what way you look at this,” she told Payload. “Farming, national security, commercial—whatever angle you take, space affects us every day.”

Polaris

The Road to the Forum: the CLPS Era

Over the next several months, traffic is expected to ramp up on the Moon, but unlike the first race to the Moon, it will be commercial vehicles leaving their tracks behind.  NASA’s decision to tap commercial partners to deliver scientific payloads to the Moon is the latest in a broader space agency move toward boosting […]

Polaris

Congress on VIPER Cancellation: Not So Fast

Four top lawmakers sent a letter to NASA late Friday casting much doubt on the agency’s decision to halt its VIPER mission after already sinking $450M into the spacecraft, which was fully assembled and awaiting testing.