Debris

WEF’s Space Debris Report Projects Significant Costs

Space Debris
Image: ESA/ID&Sense/ONiRiXEL

We’re solidly in the era of the LEO megaconstellation, and the number of satellites in an increasingly congested orbital plane just keeps climbing. We’re not fearmongering here, but putting more stuff in LEO ups the odds that a collision may occur—and bring with it serious financial and geopolitical implications.

This week, the World Economic Forum came out with a report, produced in partnership with the Centre for Space Futures, the Saudi Space Agency, LeoLabs, and Novaspace, titled “Clear Orbit, Secure Future: A Call to Action on Space Debris.”

The report’s findings are, well, expensive. 

  • Even without any major collisions in orbit, WEF’s orbital population model projects that congestion in space will cost industry between $25.8B and $42.3B over the next decade. 
  • A destructive collision would send that number skyrocketing.

“If the ambitions of a rapidly expanding space economy, encompassing commercial space stations, large satellite constellations and global satellites services are to be realized sustainably, urgent progress is needed in regulation, methodologies, international collaboration, technology innovation, and investment,” the report’s foreword said.

Hidden costs: Those projections come from a combination of revenue lost from service interruptions, satellite replacements and hardware loss, as well as from the cost of performing ever more risk-reducing maneuvers in orbit to maintain safe distances between satellites.

  • The cost of anomalies is projected to be between $14.2B and $30.7B.
  • The cost of maneuvers alone is projected to be $560M.
  • The cost of probable non-catastrophic failures, including infrastructure and service losses, is projected to be $11.1B.

The report notes that even at the high end of its projection of the cost of anomalies, $30.7B, only accounts for ~1.4% of the total value of space infrastructure in the next decade, totaling $3.03T.

The call to action: WEF is not the first to say that more collaboration between actors, including active data-sharing, is needed to prevent conjunction events in orbit. But it is the latest to call for that communication to improve. And all that is on top of better adherence to newer responsible best practices, for conducting launch and operations.

“Launch providers should commit to controlled reentries, and end the practice of abandoning upper stages in congested orbits,” the conclusion reads. “Regulators, in turn, need to embed international best practices in domestic law through licensing conditions and encouraging financial incentives that reward sustainable behaviour, where feasible and appropriate.”

Related Stories
DebrisISAMMilitary

Starfish Wins SDA Deorbit-As-A-Service Contract

Starfish says this marks the first contracted mission for end-of-life satellite disposal services, in comparison to typical missions that treat disposal as a one-off or a demo. 

BusinessDebris

Atomic-6 Space Armor to Fly in October With Portal

It’s rare for space operators to cross their fingers, hoping their sat will get hit with a piece of space debris. But that’s exactly what Atomic-6 CEO Trevor Smith is doing. 

DebrisLEO

LeoLabs Lands Cross-Government Licensing Contract

OSC will evaluate how to integrate Leolabs data into its TraCSS to extend LeoLabs’ orbital alert capabilities to the commercial sector.

DebrisEuropePolicy

ESA Unveils Worrying Space Health Index

ESA’s Health Index for the space environment currently sits at a 4. For reference, 1 is the threshold for long term orbital sustainability.