MilitaryPolicy

Rep. Jeff Crank On the Mission of the Golden Dome Caucus

Image: Rep. Jeff Crank
Image: Rep. Jeff Crank

A new caucus established this summer is aiming to educate lawmakers about Golden Dome and build a coalition to support the Trump administration’s proposed missile defense program. 

“I want to use the caucus as a translator so that every member can kind of be on board with Golden Dome, and understand what the president is trying to do with it,” Rep. Jeff Crank (R-CO), told Payload. “The caucus can serve as an opportunity for everyone to get into the same room—industry, government, and members of the administration—to talk face to face.” 

Crank established the Golden Dome Caucus in June, alongside Rep. Dale Strong (R-AL). The Senate caucus is led by Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-MT).

What’s next: The timeline set for the Golden Dome program means it needs the support of not just the armed services committees and the appropriations committees, but the majority of Congress—on both sides of the aisle. 

The caucus boasts 20+ members representing both parties who are “ready to go to bat for the president’s mission,” Crank said. The first meeting for the caucus will have Golden Dome Chief and Gen. Michael Guetlein lay out the proposed architecture. 

Cost-effective: “What is the role of the federal government? One of the main roles laid out by the founding fathers was the protection of the country. We have to take that seriously,” said Crank. 

It’s simple to argue that Golden Dome is extremely expensive and not worth the cost, Crank said, but if an adversary attacked the continental US and there were no systems that could protect against the attack, the costs to repair the damage would be significantly higher.“$500B would be a bargain at that point,” he said. 

Staying ahead: Crank, said that, while he understands the argument that the system may lead to an arms race, he disagrees with its premise, especially with adversaries such as China already investing in their own space capabilities and hypersonic tech. 

“It would be good if we could live in a world where we didn’t have to spend $500B to counter this, but unfortunately, we don’t live in that world.”

Related Stories
LaunchMilitary

SpaceX Wins the Bulk of Space Force’s 2026 Launch Contracts

The Space Force’s reliance on SpaceX remains stronger than ever.

BusinessMilitary

DARPA Awards Safran a Quantum PNT Contract

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) announced yesterday that it awarded Safran Federal Systems a contract to develop robust and reliable quantum sensors to improve the US military’s PNT architecture in multiple domains, including in space.  To effectively manage its troops and personnel across the world, the DoD says it needs extremely—and increasingly—precise ways […]

EuropeMilitary

Germany is Ramping Up Its Military Space Posture

Germany is investing €35B in national security defense assets to counter the “fundamental threat” posed by Russian and Chinese tech.

PolarisPolicy

Industry Groups Call for Change to Spectrum Sharing Limits

In a letter sent to FCC Chair Brendan Carr on Monday, the writers said lifting equivalent power-flux density (EPFD) limits on non-geostationary sats would benefit both consumers and the industry.