MilitaryQ&A

A Q&A on Hypersonic Glide Vehicles

Graphic: DARPA

What’s the expert view on hypersonic glide vehicles, in light of recent news? To get some answers, we spoke with Jaganath Sankaran, a professor at UT Austin’s LBJ School of Public Affairs. Sankaran’s research spans space weapons, missile defense, and arms control policy. 

  • NB: HGV = hypersonic glide vehicle; FOBS = fractional orbital bombardment system. Payload questions in bold; Sankaran answers in standard typeface. 

If we’re assuming that the Financial Times story holds up, how much of a surprise is this development?
Politically speaking, it’s a significant surprise. There hasn’t been a significant shift in US missile defenses that would justify the Chinese pursuit of a FOBS. Technologically, it isn’t much of a surprise. The Soviets had done it. The Chinese apparently had a test program during the Cold War and later abandoned it.

How could this technology affect global security? Do HGVs change deterrence?
Not much. There are better and cheaper ways to reinforce second-strike capabilities and China’s nuclear deterrent. A FOBS has no effect on American nuclear deterrence. We have always accepted nuclear vulnerability with China. This development does not alter that fact. 

The only plausible negative consequences would be if China deploys an extensive system and expands its nuclear arsenal. In that case, it would certainly provoke a debate in the American nuclear enterprise and may require offsetting actions. But we are not there yet. 

Are there any adequate ways to track or intercept HGVs? 
The consensus seems to be that we need newer tracking capabilities for HGVs. However, some recent research indicates that existing tracking capabilities may have more residual capacity than previously assumed.

Will this development drive calls for increased spending on specific military programs?
There is already a robust effort to fund R&D in hypersonic offense/defense weaponry. This development may be politically used to support some of those existing funding priorities.

Related Stories
MilitarySatcomVC/PE

Lockheed Martin Invests $2M in Farcast

Farcast’s technology aims to increase the US military’s satcom connectivity, especially for highly mobile troops. The company’s main competitive advantage, however, may lie in its high-quality user terminals produced at low cost.

MilitaryPolaris

EOs, Commercial Cooperation, and Culture: A Recap of Polaris After Dark

The Trump administration has ordered the Pentagon to speed up its defense acquisition process. That will require trained staff to quickly get new commercial tech under contract, according to Col. Richard Kniseley, the senior materiel leader of Space Systems Command’s Commercial Space Office.

LaunchMilitary

NRO Launches First Payload Under New NatSec Contract

The NROL-145 launch is the first under the Space Force’s Phase 3 Lane 1 rubric—a launch contracting mechanism that will spend $5.6B on relatively simple launches with fewer requirements, which might suit new entrants to the national security launch game. 

Military

We Have Some Space Questions About The Golden Dome

President Donald Trump’s executive order calling for a new, satellite-based missile defense architecture around the continental US has defense contractors salivating, but questions about the cost, capabilities, and requirement for such a system remain unanswered.