Polaris

A Roundup From The Space Capitol Forum

The crowd at Space Capitol Forum. Image: Alex Martin

The space community gathered at Payload’s first Space Capitol Forum on Tuesday to talk about ways for policy to adapt and better support the rapid advancements in space tech.

Setting the scene: The space industry is facing an important moment at the intersection of commercial space technology and policy as private companies take on missions ranging from astronaut launches to imaging Earth to attempting to harness space resources.

As these industries have developed, DC has often lagged behind. While the commercial tech is charging ahead, the regulatory and policy questions remain open, leaving companies in the lurch, sometimes showing regulators novel tech for the first time.

The forum delved into this intersection and attempted to bridge the gap between policy and industry in a few key areas: 

Orbital debris: Krystal Azelton, director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, didn’t mince words in urging the US to start acting with urgency when it comes to prioritizing space sustainability.

Janice Starzyk, the deputy director of the Office of Space Commerce, responded that the agency’s power is limited to the authorities Congress gives it. She also pointed to slow funding—for example, the office has taken flak for delays in its space traffic management system, which was ordered in 2018…but didn’t receive funding until 2023.

The one thing all panelists could agree on: it’s time for Congress to act on the matter, whether it’s the ORBITS Act or another piece of legislation. 

CLPS: Officials from Astrobotic and Firefly talked about how they’re pursuing a future lunar economy, even as legal and policy questions about ownership, infrastructure, and regulation on the Moon’s surface are still being debated domestically and internationally.

Long-term lunar missions will need power, life support, heat, and other infrastructure—a huge capital expenditure for the private market. Caryn Schenewerk, president of CS Consulting, said some in industry are discussing the idea of a lunar power purchasing agreement—essentially “if you build it, they will come.” 

The commitment, modeled after those on Earth, would allow the government to promise to buy a certain amount of capability from the private sector, allowing companies to fundraise and invest with a clearer demand signal from the market

Related Stories
Polaris

A Preview of Isaacman’s Confirmation Hearing

The fireworks start at 10am ET, when the two-time SpaceX astronaut and billionaire nominee to lead the space agency appears before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee. That will be his second appearance this year, after his first nomination for the job was pulled in May. 

Polaris

Sprint to the Finish: What’s on Deck for December

Next week is the official start of “let’s circle back on that in the new year” season—but not for Congress, where lawmakers have a handful of time-sensitive priorities on their holiday to-do list.

PolarisPolicy

A Debate on the Wolf Amendment

Necessary national security safeguard, or out-of-touch barrier to communication with a leading space power? That was the question at the heart of a debate last week on whether the Wolf Amendment is still in America’s best interest, almost 15 years after it became law.

InternationalPolaris

The Artemis Accords By the Numbers

The accords celebrated their fifth anniversary last month. As such, here’s a roundup of where they stand.