Policy

Isaacman Pays The Moon Price, Heads For Senate Floor

The next NASA administrator picking up some on the job experience last year. Image: SpaceX.

Jared Isaacman’s nomination to lead NASA will come before the full Senate after being approved by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation by a vote of 19-9. 

The full body is expected to approve the nomination in the weeks ahead, but when that happens is subject to a procedural tug-of-war between the two political parties.

Price to pay: Committee Chair Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) made clear he was voting “yes” because of Isaacman’s commitment to prioritize the Artemis lunar program instead of Martian exploration. That may put Isaacman in conflict with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who definitely may or may not have been in the room when the NASA chief nominee won over President Donald Trump.

What will put Isaacman in conflict with Musk, however, are delays in SpaceX’s Starship program, which is expected to deliver astronauts to the surface of the Moon for NASA’s Artemis program. The agency expects two “Block 3” version Starships to demo propellant transfer capabilities sometime this year, to prepare for a 2027 lunar landing. Thus far, the first two “Block 2” Starship launches have ended with a bang

Business case: A successful payments entrepreneur, Isaacman has earned praise from industry figures for his emphasis on (and enthusiastic participation in) the private space sector. His fan club includes the founders of Planet Labs, the Commercial Space Federation, and former Virgin Galactic CEO turned Congressman Rep. George Whitesides (D-CA).  

Up next: More details on NASA’s budget are expected as soon as Friday, and cuts are expected to be significant. Space groups are warning that spending reductions could devastate NASA’s science agenda, and Isaacman will have to justify them. 

Flashback: Isaacman earned more Democratic support than Jim Bridenstine, the NASA administrator during Trump’s first term. Bridenstine attracted no votes from the Democrats when his nomination was passed out of committee in 2017 of 14-13. Bridenstine attracted that opposition for his criticism of climate science and LGBTQ+ advocacy as a member of Congress; by contrast, Isaacman instituted DEI programs at his companies.

Related Stories
EuropePolicy

EU Watch: The Potential Impact of the Space Act

The act aims to boost the region’s space industry by cutting red tape, creating one standard for legal and technical requirements, and ensuring Europe’s space industry remains safe and sustainable.

EuropeInternationalLaunchPolicy

Firefly Greenlit for Future Swedish Launches

Firefly Aerospace hit another milestone in its quest to reach orbit from Europe.

EuropePolicy

ESA Watch: 2040 Vision Takes Center Stage in Paris 

ESA is thinking big in Technology 2040, a new report that provides a roadmap for the region’s future in space over the next ~15 years.

EOPolicy

EO CEOs Slam ‘Shortsighted and Perilous’ Budget Request

Leaders at six of America’s biggest remote sensing firms are urging Congress to reject cuts proposed in the Trump administration’s fiscal 2026 budget plan—a proposal that would dramatically reduce the government’s purchasing of commercial EO data.