Lockheed Martin Wants the Government to Pay For Value 

The Lockheed Martin-built Orion spacecraft on its way to the Moon in 2022
The Lockheed Martin-built Orion spacecraft on its way to the Moon in 2022. (Image: NASA)

If senior government officials get their way, fixed-price contracts will be the way of the future, with the NASA chief even calling cost-plus contracts “a plague.” But one of the government’s top suppliers is pushing back, arguing that the government’s win is proving to be a big loss for industry.

Lockheed ($LMT) CEO and Chair Jim Taiclet said Wednesday that the government—responsible for about 70% of his firm’s revenue—is squeezing defense contractors a bit too hard, and he has some ideas for how to change that. Yes, that’s right—we’re talking procurement reform.

30,000 feet: The massive aerospace contractor had a decent year, beating expectations with an EPS of $27.55, according to its earnings report. The company’s space segment was its lowest-earning but fastest growing, thanks to US investment in missile defense. 

Notably, its joint venture with Boeing, United Launch Alliance, reported negligible profits, likely due to the work required getting its brand-new Vulcan rocket flying. That should change next year—if Lockheed still owns the rocket-maker. 

What about the margins? An analyst asked Taiclet on an earnings call why Lockheed’s profit margins seem to have fallen by about 200 basis points in the last decade. He had a ready answer: the customer is to blame. 

“The government has been taking advantage of that monopsony power over the industry,” as the primary purchaser of military and space tech. Taiclet said too many of his competitors were taking risk on cost and pricing while bidding on contracts, even fixed-price offerings, leading to delays and cost-overages.

Taiclet argued that federal contract rules (and the cost transparency beloved by government auditors) are getting in the way of delivering the best technology, including that delivered by commercial tech firms who spend more on R&D than defense contractors. 

“We want to move as briskly as we can as an industry with our commercial partners to their kind of pricing,” he told analysts, acknowledging that it would take time and probably an act of Congress to abandon set fees in favor of value-based pricing.    

Test flight: Lockheed is already experimenting with service-based pricing in space with Crescent, a new subsidiary it stood up last year to offer lunar infrastructure services to the government. 

Related Stories

The US Wants to CHIP In On Rocket Lab’s Solar Cell Factory

Rocket Lab is one of three major players in the Western market that builds space-grade solar panels, and the investment will grow production 50% in the next three years.


FCC Chair Pushes For Stricter Debris Rules

The head of the FCC is calling on the agency to change its regulations to further limit how much debris is created in orbit.


NSSA: Space Force Budget ‘Insufficient’ And ‘Shortsighted’

The Pentagon’s declining budget request for the Space Force puts the US at risk of ceding leadership in space to China, according to a letter released Thursday by the National Security Space Association.


NASA Stresses Responsible Use of AI In Town Hall

NASA leadership touted the benefits of using AI in a town hall meeting on Wednesday, but emphasized that the new tech will be used in a responsible way that won’t replace the space agency’s skilled workforce.