NDAA Preview: Spaceport of the Future

Image: US Space Force

One lawmaker is looking to make military launch facilities run more like commercial airports with a pair of amendments set to be introduced tomorrow when the House Armed Services Committee debates its version of the NDAA. 

Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA) is expected to introduce two amendments on the Spaceport of the Future: one to allow the military to recoup more launch costs from companies and a second to simplify the process of leasing federal land to launch providers.

Launch bill: The first amendment will authorize the Space Force to charge companies for the indirect costs of launching from military ranges, including utilities such as power and water usage as well as wear and tear on base infrastructure, a spokesman from Carbajal’s office told Payload. 

The concern is being driven by the skyrocketing pace of launches out of both Patrick Space Force Base in Florida and Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. In 2020, the Florida range supported 31 launches, according to the Space Force. This year, the base is preparing for up to 87 launches, a number that’s only expected to keep growing. 

“When it was just ULA, the burden on the literal roads of bases [and] those indirect costs were not to the point of concern,” the spokesman said. “You can imagine that the Space Force has the concern [of] what is that going to mean for the literal range infrastructure—the roads, the bridges—that come with dragging massive rockets over them day by day.”

Crunching the numbers: Today, the Space Force charges companies for direct costs of launching from military facilities, like weather analysis or other things that directly use military resources.

Under the amendment, the indirect costs charged to a company can’t exceed 30% of their direct cost bill for a particular launch, the spokesman for Carbajal’s office said. The indirect cost reimbursement will also be capped at $5M per company each year. 

What’s next: If it passes and is included in the final legislation, the new charges will take effect when the bill becomes law. The program is set to expire in fiscal 2026 without a reauthorization from Congress, the spokesman said. It also won’t affect existing contracts that launchers have with the military, he added.

For lease: Carbajal’s second amendment would give the Space Force the authority to lease military property to commercial space companies, the spokesman said. It’s a process that can happen today, but it requires congressional action. The proposal would give the Space Force the ability to welcome new companies on base on its own.

90% of the funding generated by those leases will go back to the Space Force to support launch infrastructure, the spokesman said. 

Related Stories

Space Policy in a Second Trump Term

The Trump administration’s top priority, according to Autry, is likely to be “kicking Artemis into high gear” and ensuring Artemis III—the first crewed mission to the lunar surface since Apollo—remains on track to avoid getting beaten by the Chinese. 


Lawmakers Ask NASA About Risk of Post-ISS Gap

Congress marked up a NASA 2024 Reauthorization Bill Addressing a Post-ISS Gap.

InternationalPolicyThe State of the Japanese Space Industry

Japan Looks to Bolster its Space Sector for a Post-ISS World

The government will dole out investments from a new ¥1T( $6.2B) fund over the next ten years to back private efforts.


House To Consider NASA Reauthorization Act

“It’s been far too long since the last comprehensive NASA authorization and we’re overdue for Congressional guidance and direction,” Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK), the chair of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, told Payload in a statement, adding that his top priorities in the markup include the Moon to Mars pipeline, operations in LEO after the ISS, and balancing the science portfolio.