Military

Pentagon Emphasizes the Need for Norms

The Pentagon’s long-awaited National Defense Strategy warns that conflict in space could quickly spiral out of control without a clear set of norms and expectations.

Released Thursday, the strategy breaks out space concerns primarily into three buckets:

Dangers of escalation

The risk of accidentally escalating a conflict in space is “particularly high due to unclear norms of behavior and escalation thresholds, complex domain interactions, and new capabilities,” the strategy reads. To combat this, the department will analyze “escalation pathways and thresholds,” including planning for how to respond if an attack disrupts comms or situational awareness in orbit.  

The lack of norms of behavior in orbit is a concern on Capitol Hill as well. “We really need space doctrine that is administration-proof, regardless of who is in the White House,” Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), the chair of the House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee, told Payload. “If you look at nuclear deterrence doctrine, that is pretty well developed. Space deterrence doctrine is very immature in comparison.” (Look for more from our interview with Cooper next week.)

Resilience

The document codified the DoD’s increasing reliance on constellations of many cheaper, less capable satellites versus buying expensive, huge platforms, something SDA’s Derek Tournear underscored this week when he highlighted how the size of Starlink’s constellation has offered some protection from a Russian attack in the Ukraine war. “Proliferated LEO” is all the rage these days. 

The strategy also touched on the Pentagon’s plans for more responsive launch, saying that the military is “increasing options for reconstitution.” 

Clear and present

Dangers of space aren’t a future problem, the strategy says. China and Russia are already using counterspace weapons that could target orbital capabilities critical for both military and civilian life, including GPS, which is necessary for everything from credit card transactions to smart bomb navigation. 

NDS vs. NSS: We wrote about the White House’s National Security Strategy, which sets a government-wide blueprint, a few weeks ago. The National Defense Strategy is the Pentagon-specific document to back that up.

+ While we’re here: Unfortunately, it was not a great week for in-space saber rattling. A Russian official warned that Western commercial satellites could be shot down if they’re involved in the war in Ukraine, doubling down on threats made last month. The White House didn’t take that well, promising a military response if Russia targeted US or allied space assets.

Related Stories
MilitarySatcomVC/PE

Lockheed Martin Invests $2M in Farcast

Farcast’s technology aims to increase the US military’s satcom connectivity, especially for highly mobile troops. The company’s main competitive advantage, however, may lie in its high-quality user terminals produced at low cost.

MilitaryPolaris

EOs, Commercial Cooperation, and Culture: A Recap of Polaris After Dark

The Trump administration has ordered the Pentagon to speed up its defense acquisition process. That will require trained staff to quickly get new commercial tech under contract, according to Col. Richard Kniseley, the senior materiel leader of Space Systems Command’s Commercial Space Office.

LaunchMilitary

NRO Launches First Payload Under New NatSec Contract

The NROL-145 launch is the first under the Space Force’s Phase 3 Lane 1 rubric—a launch contracting mechanism that will spend $5.6B on relatively simple launches with fewer requirements, which might suit new entrants to the national security launch game. 

Military

We Have Some Space Questions About The Golden Dome

President Donald Trump’s executive order calling for a new, satellite-based missile defense architecture around the continental US has defense contractors salivating, but questions about the cost, capabilities, and requirement for such a system remain unanswered.