Polaris

Report Highlights Space Force’s Long-Term Research Gap

Image: US Air Force

The Space Force should boost its use of venture capital funding to have more influence over where private entities are focusing their science and tech investments, according to a RAND report

Context: The report, which examined how to improve space-focused science and technology processes within the Space Force, made nine recommendations for service leaders about ways to help the branch invest in long-term exploratory research, break down silos within the Defense Department, and better tap into commercial innovation. 

DoD’s Space Warfighting Analysis Center asked RAND to examine the topic amid concerns that the US tech advantage is eroding as other nations (read: China) boost their investment in foundational research.

Top takeaways: The report included several significant findings including:

  • The Space Force’s investment in innovation is focused on later-stage tech that can quickly get into troops’ hands, while longer-term research that may or may not yield a result is “relatively underfunded.”
  • The military has limited sway over how the private industry invests in research, and few opportunities to share its top priorities with companies.
  • The Air Force Research Lab takes the lead on the Space Force’s science and technology research, but the military branch has “no formal authority” to shape where the lab invests.

Recommendations: RAND also made several recommendations to the Space Force for how to boost its focus on science and technology research and investment:

  • The Space Force should allocate more of its science and technology budget as venture capital funds through the SpaceWERX program to have a better connection to commercial innovation.
  • AFRL should allow Space Force officials to direct the allocation of ~20% of its space funding to give the service more control over its focus areas.
  • The Space Force should task the office of the assistant secretary of the Air Force for space acquisition with overseeing the space science and technology efforts. The service’s chief technology innovation officer should also work on filling gaps in the broader S&T portfolio.
Related Stories
Polaris

EO Providers Defend Their Spectrum Access

Commercial EO providers contribute to sectors ranging from agriculture to climate monitoring to defense—and now they’re banding together to make sure policymakers know the results of an administration-ordered study could put all of that in jeopardy.

Polaris

A Roundup From The Space Capitol Forum

The space community gathered at Payload’s first Space Capitol Forum on Tuesday to talk about ways for policy to adapt and better support the rapid advancements in space tech.

Polaris

Space Foundation Looks to Boost DC Presence

“I don’t care what way you look at this,” she told Payload. “Farming, national security, commercial—whatever angle you take, space affects us every day.”

Polaris

The Road to the Forum: the CLPS Era

Over the next several months, traffic is expected to ramp up on the Moon, but unlike the first race to the Moon, it will be commercial vehicles leaving their tracks behind.  NASA’s decision to tap commercial partners to deliver scientific payloads to the Moon is the latest in a broader space agency move toward boosting […]