MilitaryPolaris

Space Force Earns a ‘Marginal’ Grade From Heritage Foundation

The Space Force is not currently able to offer troops the real-time operational intelligence from space that would be required during a potential conflict conflict with an adversary like China, according to a report from the Heritage Foundation.

Overall, the conservative think tank ranked the service as “marginal,” the middle of a five-tiered grading scale from “very weak” to “very strong.” 

Context: The annual Index of US Military Strength evaluates how well the military as a whole is prepared and equipped to respond to current threats, as well as an in-depth look at the state of each service. 

In the 2023 report, the Space Force earned a rating of “weak.” This year’s “marginal” is a one tier improvement from last year.

Deeper dive: John Venable, senior research fellow for defense policy at the think tank who wrote the Space Force portion of the report, evaluated the service in three areas—capacity, capability, and readiness—and averaged their findings to determine the overall grade. Spoiler: each area received a “marginal” grade, making determining the average pretty easy. 

Capacity: The Space Force has enough capacity to fulfill position, navigation, and timing demands as well as the military’s comms and imaging needs. But gaps in capacity mean the service is not able to meet troops’ growing need for on-demand, tactical info to be used in times of conflict. 

“The USSF’s current visible capacity is not sufficient to support, fight, or weather a war with a peer competitor,” the report said. 

Capability: The report commended the Space Development Agency for quickly getting new birds in the air, but found that overall, most of the Space Force’s assets are simply too old, reducing the service’s capability. There are a few areas where the service is making improvement: SSA, defensive, and offensive capabilities, the report found.

Readiness: The Guardians who transitioned into the new service have done a good job of maintaining readiness, according to the report. But the service has not made strides toward two of its readiness goals: providing near real-time support from space for military operations and executing both offensive and defensive operations.

Related Stories
Polaris

How Artemis Got Its Name

“We had one clear objective on this plan: make Artemis uncancelable.”

BusinessInternationalMilitary

The $570B Space Economy

For the third year in a row, government space budgets saw double digit percentage increases, driven by the significant militarization of space.

Polaris

Space Policy in a Second Trump Term

The Trump administration’s top priority, according to Autry, is likely to be “kicking Artemis into high gear” and ensuring Artemis III—the first crewed mission to the lunar surface since Apollo—remains on track to avoid getting beaten by the Chinese. 

Polaris

House To Consider NASA Reauthorization Act

“It’s been far too long since the last comprehensive NASA authorization and we’re overdue for Congressional guidance and direction,” Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK), the chair of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, told Payload in a statement, adding that his top priorities in the markup include the Moon to Mars pipeline, operations in LEO after the ISS, and balancing the science portfolio.