Civil

SpaceX Won’t Be Visiting Hubble Anytime Soon

The Hubble telescope. Image: NASA

Hubble has seen better days—and with NASA formally rejecting SpaceX’s commercial repair offer, that’s unlikely to change. 

Science missions have been paused since May 24, when one of the telescope’s three gyroscopes, used to orient the instrument toward targets in space, failed to return accurate telemetry readings.

To the rescue: Jared Isaacman, the billionaire entrepreneur and SpaceX astronaut, had previously offered his services as a handyman to repair the 34-year-old telescope and provide a boost to keep it from falling out of orbit. The mission would have marked the first space walk by a SpaceX crew.

However, Mark Clampin, NASA’s director of astrophysics, confirmed on Tuesday that the agency would not pursue Isaacman’s offer. Instead, Hubble will switch to a single gyro, keeping the second in reserve to make sure it can operate into the next decade.

Risky business: While Isaacman’s offer seemed attractive from a financial standpoint (the agency wouldn’t have needed to fund its own repair mission), Clampin outlined why the potential risks associated with an in-person visit to the spacecraft far outweighed the benefits.

  •  Operational risks: the potential contamination of a mirror by an astronaut could damage Hubble’s sensitivity
  • Docking risks: Hubble’s last visitor came in 2009 aboard the Space Shuttle, so attempting to dock a new spacecraft would be too dicey on short notice
  • Technological risks: Many of Hubble’s original builders have retired, meaning working knowledge of the telescope’s intricacies has moved to Scottsdale to play golf

What’s next: Operating with a single gyro won’t affect Hubble’s ability to peer into deep space, but there will be some noticeable blind spots moving forward. When it’s back online in mid-June, it will no longer be able to view objects closer than Mars, and its weekly orbits will be reduced from 85 to 74, or a 12% reduction in the number of missions it can schedule.

Worries persist over the gap in space science capabilities that could be left if Hubble is allowed to fall back to Earth, which could occur as soon as 2034, but NASA officials said they haven’t ruled out a reboost mission down the line. 

And if that time comes, SpaceX’s proposal will prove invaluable, giving NASA “better insight into the considerations for developing a future commercial re-boost mission,” according to Patrick Crouse, Hubble’s project manager.

Related Stories
CivilEurope

UK Space Agency Sees Budget Growth Under DSIT

this week we got our first indication of what the UK space industry can expect—at least, from a financial perspective—after announcing its joining the UK government’s Department of Science, Innovation, and Technology

CivilInternationalLaunch

Canadian Spaceport Gets $7M For Orbital Launch

One of Canada’s spaceports received new orbital-launch funding, aimed partly at sovereign defense needs.

CivilLunarPolicy

Duffy Opens Competition to Speed Up Lunar Landing

“I love SpaceX; it’s an amazing company. The problem is, they’re behind…and we’re in a race against China,” Duffy said on CNBC’s Squawk Box. “So I’m going to open up the contract. I’m going to let other space companies compete with SpaceX.”

CivilLunarMoon

Will NASA Pick Two Companies to Build the LTV?

While the LTV contractors take different approaches to meet NASA’s requirements—from a rugged truck, to a tractor-trailor configuration—they have similar goals for future commercial customers looking to hitch a ride.