Policy

What a Debt Limit Deal Could Mean for NASA

Image: National Park Service

The debt limit deal reached late Saturday night contains both good and bad news for NASA.

The plan from President Joe Biden and Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), which is expected to get a vote in the House on Wednesday, would keep non-defense spending roughly flat in fiscal year 2024, with a 1% bump in 2025, according to White House officials.

By the numbers: 

  • $27.2B = NASA’s fiscal 2024 budget request
  • $25.4B = NASA’s fiscal 2023 funding

It’s important to note that the debt limit deal sets the cap on government-wide non-defense spending, not on specific agencies. So it will be up to appropriators to decide how much of the non-defense pie goes to NASA, and they could either impose more significant cuts or grant some relief. But if the proposed plan is applied evenly to the space program:

  • The bad news: A flat fiscal 2024 budget would be $25.4B, putting the space agency about $1.8B under its request. The agency’s budget request included plus-ups for the human landing system for Artemis moon missions, space technology, biological and physical science programs, and Earth science, according to a Planetary Society analysis.
  • The good news: A flat budget for 2024 is better for the space agency than two plans proposed by the GOP that would further curtail NASA’s budget. The House passed a bill this month that would cap fiscal 2024 spending at fiscal 2022 levels. If all agencies absorbed that cut equally, that would have meant $24B for the space agency. But Republicans were also considering a plan to make even deeper cuts to non-defense discretionary spending to protect defense spending, which would amount to a 22 percent cut to non-defense agencies. For NASA, that would mean a budget of about $19.8B.
Related Stories
BusinessPolicy

Commerce Nominee: Space Data “Fundamental” to US Leadership

Howard Lutnick, Trump’s nominee to serve as secretary of commerce, committed to supporting the commercial space sector in his confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

OpinionPolarisPolicy

Op-ed: Why Outdated Regs Are Holding Back the Nuclear Space Race

Regulators must find ways to balance safety and national security concerns surrounding nuclear systems and materials with the mandate for America to lead in space and the drive for a thriving commercial space economy, especially as nuclear technology becomes safer and less risky thanks to new advancements.

BusinessPolicy

What the Trump Administration Could Mean for Primes

“If I was at a large established prime that’s 20+ years or older, I would be in the war room thinking about how the hell we’re going to deal with this,” one space industry source told Payload. “They have a clear preference for the Andurils of the world.”

InternationalPolicy

Finland Joins the Artemis Accords

Finland’s addition to the group signals its commitment to the West’s strategy of beefing up its defense posture in space.