There’s been a lot of criticism of the FY27 NASA budget proposal. Leaders on multiple congressional committees have vowed to block the proposed cuts, and The Planetary Society’s Casey Dreier likened it to an “extinction-level event” for the agency.
But not everyone is unhappy with the proposal as written, and that faint sound of cheering is coming from the budding space nuclear industry, which sees the bill as potentially kick-starting their wildest dreams.
Love language: Isaacman is framing the FY27 proposal as an attempt to reorganize the agency around a singular focus: space exploration. As a result, it advances many high-level goals that will necessarily require space nuclear power for lunar spacecraft to survive the lunar night, and eventually, to support human efforts on Mars. Three line items in the FY27 proposal specifically set aside funds for space nuclear efforts:
- $438.8M for Mars technology, which includes the development of fission reactors as a “major focus;”
- $135.3M for radioisotope power systems;
- $100.9M for space infrastructure and exploration, which includes funding for the Harmonia Radioisotope Power System Tipping Point team to demonstrate a Stirling generator and lander integration system, with the eventual plan to build into a flight-ready system for future missions.
More than just money, however, NASA is throwing its full weight behind what Isaacman sees as the agency’s “logical evolution.”
“You will not find an administrator that is a greater champion of nuclear power and propulsion than me,” Isaacman told the House Appropriations Commerce, Justice, and Science Subcommittee this week. “I hope because of the work we’re doing right now…that there is an administrator sitting in front of you 10 years from now and asking for money that’s measured in billions towards nuclear power and propulsion.”
Coupled with the NASA Reauthorization Act of 2026, which included three amendments to boost support for space nuclear priorities, it feels like this sector of the industry is having a moment.
The Feeling is mutual: For the space nuclear industry, the FY27 proposals and Isaacman’s comments ring like Baby Shark in a daycare.
“The commercial space nuclear [industry], I don’t think exists today, but we believe that it could exist in the future,” BWXT president of advanced technologies Kate Kelly told Payload. “The role that NASA is playing is helping lead and navigate that first-of-a-kind transition to demonstrate the technology.”
Already, space nuclear firms are hitting the gas in the expectation that NASA is creating a new market just for them.
“We now see the opportunity to lean forward and invest more in our space product, recognizing that there is that clear demand,” Tyler Bernstein, CEO of Zeno Power, which is developing radioisotope systems for the Harmonia project, told Payload. “We’re seeing a lot of private investors that are excited about that opportunity.”

