CivilMoon

Nelson ‘Fairly Confident’ In Lunar Surface Mission Timeline

Image: NASA/Bill Ingalls

Lawmakers quizzed NASA Administrator Bill Nelson on Thursday about what the space agency needs to keep the first crewed mission to the Moon’s surface on track for a 2025 launch date. 

In addition to Artemis, members of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee asked the former FL Democrat how the US could stay competitive with China in LEO, how the agency is cooperating with Russia on the ISS, and how a Republican-backed 22% budget cut to civilian agencies would impact everything from returning samples of Martian soil to Earth to tracking climate change and extreme weather from space. 

Surface or bust

Lawmakers asked excitedly about Artemis 3, which will use a lunar lander version of Starship to bring NASA astronauts to the Moon’s surface for the first time since Apollo. After Starship blew up mid-air during its first orbital test launch last week, Rep. Frank Lucas, R-OK, who chairs the committee, asked Nelson his level of confidence that the mission would launch as expected in late 2025.

Nelson acknowledged that Starship is the only piece for the mission still in development, since Orion and SLS flew on Artemis 1.

“It blew a hole in that launch pad, so I have asked so I can report to you as of today that SpaceX is still saying that they think it will take about at least two months to rebuild the launch pad and concurrently about two months to have their second vehicle ready to launch,” Nelson said. 

“The explosion, that’s not a big downer in the way that SpaceX does things,” he continued. “I’m fairly confident [in the timeline], but there are a lot of things that still have to be done.” 

Zing

Not all the lawmakers were convinced, despite Nelson’s optimism. Shortly after Nelson explained that SpaceX’s lander was chosen because SpaceX “underbid everyone else by half,” Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-CA, the committee’s ranking member, responded with a dig. 

“When I saw that rocket blow up, I thought, ‘Thank God there’s no people onboard,’” she said. “Sometimes the lowest bidder is not always the best choice.”

Like Christmas morning: Nelson came bearing a gift for lawmakers: a copy of the 2010 NASA Authorization Act that flew in space on the Artemis 1 mission last year. 

Related Stories
MoonPolicy

NASA’s FY26 Plan Would Cut Gateway, Phase Out SLS, Orion

The Trump administration’s proposed budget for NASA focuses on beating China back to the Moon and sending the first humans to Mars at the expense of every other part of the space agency’s budget.

CislunarDeep SpaceMoon

Lockheed Martin Hands Over Orion for Artemis II

It is scheduled to carry four astronauts around the Moon in early 2026.

LunarMoonMoonshot Mechanics 2025Technology

Start Your Engines: The Lunar Rover Race Has Begun 

Payload spoke with several companies building next-gen lunar rovers—including Astrolab, ispace, Intuitive Machines, and Lunar Outpost—about the biggest challenges and opportunities in this sector. 

CivilPolicy

States Vying to Welcome America’s Space Workforce

The headquarters of NASA and US Space Command are caught in a nationwide clash that has many in the US civil and military space workforce wondering: should I stay or should I go?